Monday, November 30, 2015

Women Outperforming Men In School


In recent years there have been a number of articles posted both in all forms of media in regards to women out performing men in school. "Women are almost 60 percent of the annual university graduates and more than 70 percent of 2012 high school valedictorians. Women account for 60 percent of master's degrees and 52 percent of doctorates being awarded in the USA."(Camie) There is no question that women are indeed outperforming men, the question is why? A number of these articles claim that this can be attributed to a change in the education system that now favors women's learning techniques and disfavors men's.  The fact of the matter is that the teaching methods really haven't changed that significantly, the only thing thats really has changed is that women are now in a better position to go to school and get degrees than they ever have been in the past. So is it that men are inherently less capable of doing well in school, or could it be a form of socialization that makes men less capable, or women more capable? 
Number of Master's Degrees conferred by Gender 1969-2010


 A study conducted by Martin Seligman and Angela Lee Duckworth  in 2006 "found that middle-school girls edge out boys in overall self-discipline."(Gnaulatin) They also found that even in kindergarten, the difference between self-regulation in boys is a year behind than that of the girls. As school- especially higher education- requires adequate self-regulation and discipline, one could attribute women's surpassing of men academically to the fact that they are simply better at disciplining themselves than men. " Girls succeed over boys in school because they are more apt to plan ahead, set academic goals, and put effort into achieving those goals."(Gnaulati). A New York Times article stated that "...boys are far more likely than girls to be suspended or expelled, or have a learning disability or emotional problem diagnosed... more likely to drop out of high school, commit suicide or be incarcerated...such difficulties can have echoes even in college men."(Lewin) It suggested that men seem to actually be inherently less apt for school than women because of negative traits that more often affect men. But these traits aren't necessarily inherent, they are actually more likely attributed to a socialization created by a distinct narrative of masculinity and femininity.

Digging deeper into the socialization of men and how that affects their performance in school, William Pollack, the director of the Centers for Men and Young Men at McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School, stated that men "have a sense of lassitude, a lack of focus..." that women do not, and this affects them academically (Lewin) But it's not that this is an inherent flaw, it is taught. We could look at the social aspect of it, and the hegemonic views of masculinity, and consider (how a male Dickson's College student put it):  "it's like some cultural A.D.D. for boys, I think — like Bart Simpson. For men, it's just not cool to study.”(Lewin) Claudia Butchman, a sociology professor at Ohio State University attributed this to an "out-dated view of masculinity—that it’s more about physical strength”(Flannery) Even from a very young age boys are usually allowed more leeway in their actions because "boys will be boys," where as women to this day at a young age are being taught to be "young ladies" and to sit still and behave. Furthering this point, "U.C.L.A.'s Higher Education Research Institute annual studies... found that men were more likely than women to skip classes, not complete their homework and not turn it in on time."(Lewin) So there is an apparent trend of men not striving to do well in school as much as their fellow female classmate and a plausible explanation for this is the fact that it's simply not part of their narrative. But women out performing men can't be explained through just looking at men. One of my initial and primary theories was that women have more motivation to do well in school because they know that they are at a disadvantage compared to men in the workforce. It is commonly known that women make less money than men in general- and this is still prominent regardless of their educational gains. "Despite these educational gains, women continue to lag behind men in employment, income, business ownership, research and politics"(Chamie) Because our society prescribes women with a narrative that limits them to lower paying jobs, or simply lower wages, women may feel the need to do exceptionally well in their education to overcome said narrative.  In regards to how this could help women actually do better than men, we can consider the idea that"boys, on the other hand, are more likely to say that they’re going to make a lot of money even without education. They’re overly optimistic."(Flannery). That being said women have a motivational drive that men are lacking in their academic life, because women need to work harder to achieve what men take for granted. And the men don't feel the pressure or need to achieve as much in school because they think they can just "sit back and relax and when they graduate, they'll still get a good job.... that if they have a firm handshake and speak properly, they'll be fine."(Lewin)

Although there is no certain explanation for why women are outperforming men in school, we do have two logical solutions. The first being that women have always been capable of outperforming men, because they inherently have a skill set that men generally don't that benefits them in academic life, and that men have a lag in this regard. And only in the recent years (since the mid 1900s )have women been able to show to show this by being able to attend schools and function in schools in a way that has allowed them to demonstrate their aptitude to surpass men academically. Or we can look at a socialization and narrative for both men and women as the crucial factor. Being that men's narrative makes studying "uncool," and that men can play off the fact that they are men and will inherently make more money than women in the future and have more job opportunities than women. This creates a lack of motivation to strive for exceptional work in school. The women's narrative on the other hand gives them lower income than men, and this motivates women to strive for more exceptional educational feats- allowing them to break free from this stratifying narration. Regardless of the reason, women are outperforming men academically, yet are still being paid less. The concern of these articles should not be on the fact that women are outperforming men, but the fact that despite this they still have lower income than men.





Sources:
Lewin, Tamar. "At Colleges, Women Are Leaving Men in the Dust." The New York Times. The New York Times, 8 July 2006. Web. 27 Nov. 2015.

 Flannery, Mary. "Why Girls Are Outperforming Boys in School - NEA Today." NEA Today. National Education Association, 5 Mar. 2013. Web. 28 Nov. 2015.

 Camie, Joseph. "Women More Educated Than Men But Still Paid Less." Women More Educated Than Men But Still Paid Less. Yale Global. Web. 28 Nov. 2015.

 Gnaulati, Enrico. "Why Girls Tend to Get Better Grades Than Boys Do." The Atlantic. Atlantic Media Company, 18 Sept. 2014. Web. 28 Nov. 2015.



4 comments:

  1. To offer some other opinions on the reasons for the stronger performance of women, a paper I read for the stratification assignment argued that beyond the returns of making up the wage gap, women who were educated also were more likely to get and stay married, which they postulated was yet another return on the investment of education that benefited women and drove them to seek a higher education.
    They also offered the idea that the value of higher education for men has become less certain and so more men have avoided college while women see more benefit more from the investment, even if it does allow them to fully negate the wage disparity. Perhaps women are also being socialized to perform better knowing these greater benefits? Though this may not answer the last question of why the gap is not closed, it some interesting additional data for the topic.


    Diprete, Albert. Buchmann, Claudia. "Gender specific Trends in the Value of Education and the Emerging Gender Gap in College Education" Demography, Volume 43, Number 1, February 2006, pp. 1-24

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is interesting to see that we focus more on the differences between men's and women's learning, but we forget that our gender does not define our abilities of learning. Rather than focusing on "women/men's learning" we could be focusing on practical, technical, etc. learning. How do we learn best? How do different personalities learn best? By reading? By listening? By what? This should be our focus... But we can even recognize in our separation of focus our gendered ideas of society. It's not about women's or men's jobs nor studies, but individuals' ways of learning and working.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Recently this semester in my Adolescent and Adult Development Class, Psych-330 if you were wondering, My professor who I will leave unnamed discussed the topic of learning in school and the differences between the genders. She discussed how an explanation in psychology for the difference is that there could be a possibility that most educators are females and that the way school is set up is at a disadvantage for younger boys a the start because they cannot sit still. But I'm not sold on that because I was very relaxed when I was young. Just trying to play devil's advocate though.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Do you think something needs to be done about this to make the educational success of both men and women more equal? I was talking to my girlfriend about this and we both agreed that women tend to mature faster, which contributes to their ability to improve their management skills, planning skills and social skills. Men, however, spend a inordinate amount of time focusing on their social status, image, sports teams' success and masculinity. Both sexes value things differently, but teaching young men to behave certain ways from day 1 is not the route we should be leading them on.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.