Religion and social change are slowly becoming less
exclusive in the United States.
This is the hunch I had when I saw this picture on Facebook.
The Church of Latter-Day Saints is historically as socially progressive as
Jehovah’s Witnesses and Catholics; quite conservative in fact. It took until
1978 for the LDS to allow black members of the church to attain priesthood and
participate in any basic leadership roles. So the fact that there were Mormons,
albeit from the San Francisco area which is renown for open-mindedness, were
marching in the 2014 Pride Parade seemed out of place. Perhaps the liberal
sides of religious communities does not receive as much media coverage because
of the other extreme. For the most part religiousness still coincides with both
levels of social progressiveness and party lines.
With 85.9% Americans self-identifying as religiously
affiliated, The United States is still vastly religious. And although the group
of unaffiliated people is growing, almost a quarter of those unaffiliated still
consider themselves religious. But even though those that are more religious
are also more likely to be socially conservative, the liberal religious still
exist.
Even religions known for social conservatism have groups,
whether small or large, influential or a small fry, engaged in liberal ideas
and social change. In the case of Mormons at Pride parade, they may be the
liberal outliers in a more conservative religion.
Our stereotype for the faithful does not hold space for the
faithful to also be just as dynamic, or not, as the American population. For
example, last week Pope Francis upheld the Catholic church’s view that
evolution and the Big Bang were both accepted theories and concordant with
G-d’s plan. Although the Pope continues to uphold other conservative church
views towards sexuality, abortion and contraception, he is remarkably
progressive in interfaith communication and acceptance. The media went wild
last Sunday when he affirmed that the Catholic Church did in fact believe in
evolution and the big bang—as G-d’s plan, of course. Most online articles one
can find on this will ignore the fact that Pope Francis is not the first pope
to reconcile evolution with Catholicism. The first pope to do so was Pope Pius
XII in 1950. The media perpetuated the rigid idea that all religion hangs on to
philosophies of the Renaissance.
As the Pew research shows, the modern United States is just
as religious as it has ever been. Even though the religious fabric is fluid, a
vast majority of Americans stay connected to a faith. Despite this, our society
continues to evolve. It is only despite because in the past religious
institutions have not been on the forefront of social change—on the contrary
they often uphold tradition and a more static society. The more extreme a
religion, the more strongly a religion holds fast to the past. Or so one would
assume. But perhaps this idea of religion equals conservative views is too
overarching. Yes, there are Mormons who are strongly conservative, and yes it
is a socially conservative religion, but there are also socially liberal
Mormons. In the united states we have a strange relationship with religion. We
believe in the separation of church and state and yet swear people into public
office with the bible. There may be the outward perception that religion is an
“other”, but in reality the faithful are everywhere—even in pride parades.
I find this really fascinating especially about how our society/media focuses on ideas and activities that are not representative of the majority of society. For example, the focus on the Westboro Baptist Church is pretty huge but the actual church membership is only 39 people. Our media tends to focus on things that are only super controversial or have to do with celebrities.
ReplyDelete