Between
1992 and 2001, there were 53 million mental-health related emergency department
contacts in the United States (Downey 2009). 23.6 out of 1,000 patients that
come into the emergency department are due to mental health-related issues (Downey
2009). This is becoming a very prevalent problem in the United States, and it stems
from several factors including inadequate alternatives consequently making
emergency departments and their psychiatric emergency services a primary acute
care setting, but also due to how we are socialized in the United States today.
I
have been exposed to this issue in the Emergency Department at Oregon Health
& Science University where I have been working for about six months now as
a Research Assistant in the Clinical Research Investigative Studies Program. Over
the past months, the part of the emergency department that has intrigued me the
most is the difference in the treatment of “normal” patients who come in for
“normal” clinical emergencies—motor vehicle crashes, chest pain, abdominal
pain, etc.—versus patients that come in with mental health-related emergencies.
There are many reasons that an individual can be classified as a psychiatric
emergency including suicidal ideations (SI), violent or disruptive behavior,
mania, intoxication states, and anxiety, among other presentations. Each of
these chief complaints would be cause to place the individual in the
psychiatric wing of the emergency department in the psychiatric rooms.
At
the top of this post you can see two images depicting the differences between
the psychiatric rooms at OHSU versus all of the other rooms in the department.
As you can see there are huge differences, most notably that the psych room
consists only of a bed on the floor in the corner of the room and has cameras in
each corner to provide 24-hour surveillance of the patient in the room.
The
question that comes to my mind each time I pass the psychiatric wing is: Is
this subordinate treatment of mentally ill patients in terms of room type in
the emergency department a form of inequality? Are these individuals being
discriminated against due to their innate characteristics? In my opinion, the answer to each of these questions is yes. The treatment of individuals with mental
health-related issues in a different type of room and wing of the emergency
department compared to non-mentally ill related emergencies is comparable to other
inequalities in society such as gender inequality and race inequality. Mentally ill
patients are discriminated against due to their innate personal qualities
leading to a new manifestation of inequality known as inequality in mental
health. Inequality in mental health and illness is a longstanding issue in
research that was initially studied by sociologists, but has now been taken up
by many other scholars such as epidemiologists. In order to address the issue
of inequality in mental health sociologically, we must look at the underlying
issue as to how our society is socialized to perceive individuals with mental
illness and consequently why they are treated differently once they arrive at
the emergency room.
In
modern research, there have been two contrasting theories as to why inequality
in mental health exists. The first theory is known as social selection and it states that people become poor because they
are mentally ill and thus unable to function in society (Ramon 2007). The
second theory is known as social
causation and states that individuals become mentally ill because of being
poor (Ramon 2007). In each theory, however, we see the word social. This emphasizes the point that
mental illness in it of itself and how society views mental illness is a social
construction of reality in which we are socialized to view in a certain way. In
modern society, we are socialized in such a way that creates a stigma that
erodes confidence that mental disorders are real health conditions. We have
allowed this stigma to grow an unwarranted sense of attitudinal, structural,
and financial barriers to effective treatment and recovery, which has led to
this problem of inequality in mental health that is emphasized by this example
in emergency departments across the country.
Mentally ill individuals do not have
access to proper health care, medications, housing and other necessities that
they cannot provide for themselves, which leads to another separate, but
related issue in modern society. That is, mentally ill individuals make up more
than 1/3 of the United States homeless population, or 250,000 people (Downey
2009). We can see the relationship between the two issues of homelessness and
frequent emergency room department visits in that the deinstitutionalization,
inadequate community resources, and the large number of uninsured homeless
individuals causes the emergency room to act as a sort of primary care facility.
Because emergency departments are acting as primary care facilities, the inequality
in mental health is reinforced through the subordinate treatment of mentally
ill individuals once they arrive to the emergency department—in terms of their
room type as well as their actual medical treatment. The source of this
disparate treatment is our social construction of reality that individuals with
mental health-related issues are dangerous and outliers of society, therefore
they must be kept in a special room, in a special wing of the emergency
department. The ideas of fear and uncertainty toward mental illness have been
ingrained in our minds through different agents of socialization, which has led
to these evident disparities in treatment.
This
problem could be avoided entirely however, if we, as the United States
population and taxpayers of the country, were able to provide the support that
these individuals need. Research has shown that if taxpayers in the United
States were to provide the support in terms of housing, healthcare, etc., for
individuals with mental illness, that taxpayers would actually save money each
year. The frequent visits to the emergency room cost taxpayers more money and contribute
to this inequality in mental health. More importantly than saving taxpayers money, providing these
necessities would help to end the inequality in mental health that we see across
the United States in emergency departments, but also in many other situations,
that stems from our socialization and apathy towards action to help.
References
Downey
LV, Zun LS, Gonzales SJ. Utilization of emergency department by psychiatric
patients. Primary Psychiatry 2009;16:60–4.
Ramon,
Shulamit. Inequality In Mental Health: The Relevance of Current Research and
Understanding To Potentially Effective Social Work Responses. Radical Psychology
2007.
Tartakovsky, M. (2012). What Many
People Don’t Get About Mental Illness. Psych Central. Retrieved on
December 1, 2014, from
http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2012/11/04/what-many-people-dont-get-about-mental-illness/
I think the subject of mental illness is sort of problematic when discusses within a sociological lens. The only mental illness that have been pervasive in their universality are depression and schizophrenia, both diseases with a biological basis in the brain. What illnesses are left are cultural particulars, and I think we can see the impact of certain cultural values and institutions through the illnesses that arise within specific cultures. Cultures with high levels of social integration see higher rates of anxiety and of depression/suicidal ideation, which speaks to the way in which our cultures can have very real impacts on our biology. Multiple personality disorder is another example of an affliction that does not appear pan-culturally, but has been thought to arise and self perpetuate out the patients' awareness of the disease. This idea can be seen as a mode of cultural expression of internal psychological stress.
ReplyDelete