Heroin has made a large comeback
in the past decade with usage increasing among all demographic groups. While
the story of rising drug usage sounds familiar, what has drastically changed in
recent years is the rhetoric surrounding the issue and the policies taken by
the government to combat it. The heroin epidemic is treated more and more
commonly not as a “war” against drugs but as a public health crisis. In the new
conflict against heroin, compassion and forgiveness have replaced the scorn
and derision once heaped upon so-called “junkies.” While this is a positive development
as far as effectively treating the epidemic goes, there is an interesting
correlation between race and the tone of the discussion on heroin. It can
hardly be seen as a coincidence that the softening of rhetoric has directly
correlated with the rate of heroin usage among whites.
90% of the people who tried heroin for the first time in the last decade where white and usage rates in suburban
white communities have been sky rocketing as prescription opioid abuse leads
more and more people into addiction to cheaper and stronger heroin. Deaths
from heroin also quadrupled to 8,260 from 2000 to 2013. This means that
heroin is having a historically high impact in white middle class communities.
This correlation seems to indicate
that although heroin use and deaths from it have been a problem for a long
time, it was only once the heroin epidemic spread to white communities that
substantive action on the issue was taken. When the negative impact of the
epidemic was limited to black and Hispanic communities we had the war on drugs,
harsh mandatory sentences for drug offenders, and punishment favored over
rehabilitation for drug addicts. Now these policies are being replaced with an
emphasis on forgiveness and care, seemingly directed at the new category of
white middle class users. While the war on drugs was once used to reinforce
racial stratification by imprisoning and oppressing racial minorities for their
drug use, the involvement of large numbers of whites now seems to have changed
the dynamic of drug policy.
More information and the source of my statistics can be found here: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/31/us/heroin-war-on-drugs-parents.html?_r=0
This reminded me of an instance in Southern Indiana in which the local governments began to recognize a significant spike in both heroin use and HIV diagnoses, the highest HIV outbreak in Indiana history. This was declared an emergency and In response during the spring of 2014 the Scott County government implicated a clean needle exchange program to directly combat the spread of the the virus. While this is response is impressively proactive and progressive it contrasts with the broader national attitude toward heroin use. In 2011 the US congress reinstated a federal ban on public funding for clean needle exchange programs. Moreover, such amnesty and recognition for public health concerns has not extended to many states with greater heroin usage, numbers HIV cases, and black and latino populations. One example would be in the state of New York in which deaths due to heroin usage out number murders and 83% of all injection drug users who contract HIV were black or hispanic in 2008. While clean needle programs are available in New York, this one instance in a county in Indiana more so highly publicized and is being treated with far more concern. Many news outlets and viewers have praised the government of Scott County government for their response to the issue. As Scott County is 97.7% white, this has contributed to the growing conception of heroin as a white man's issue and therefore a public issue.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete