(Invisible Children 2012) |
I was scrolling through Facebook when I came across an article declaring “Both the U.S. and Uganda have called off the search for notorious warlord Joseph Kony and his followers, the Lord's Resistance Army, saying that Kony's power has dwindled to the point that he's no longer a threat.” (Domonoske 2017). The article brought my mind back to the massively viral Kony 2012 social media campaign, and the many criticisms leveled against it. Like millions others, I saw the Kony 2012 video when it came out and shared it on Facebook. Later, criticisms of the Kony 2012 video began to spread. I remember feeling foolish for sharing the video in the first place. Seeing the new article on calling off the search for Kony got me thinking about the sociological aspects of the Kony 2012 craze. How did a thirty-minute documentary style video become one of the most viewed videos on the internet?
To summarize, the Kony 2012 video effectively pulled on
viewer’s heart strings to raise awareness of Ugandan warlord Joseph Kony
(Invisible Children 2012). The video simplified
and misrepresented the actual conflict with Joseph Kony. It indicated that Kony was operating in
Uganda and that Kony’s army, the LRA, had tens of thousands of soldiers. However, in his article criticizing the Kony
2012 video, journalist Joshua Keating points that “Joseph Kony is not in Uganda
and hasn’t been for 6 years,” and that “the LRA now numbers at most in the
hundreds” (Keating 2012). The idea
behind the video was to raise awareness so that the US government would go
after Joseph Kony. This was a
problematic message because US military action could result in more violence
and conflict (“Fact Checking” 2012).
Invisible Children, the charity behind the Kony 2012 video has also been
criticized for spending their funding on “staff salaries and making films that
attract much publicity, but don't do much to help people on the ground” (Rozen
2012). According to the New York Times,
in 2011 only 32 percent Invisible Children’s funds went to direct services. Clearly the Kony 2012 video was deceptive,
and the foundation behind it questionable.
(Goodman 2012) |
The Kony 2012 video succeeded in going viral because it instilled
a sense of responsibility in its viewers.
The video empowers viewers, making them believe that by spreading
awareness they can make a difference.
Specifically, the video prompts viewers to share the video on social
media (Invisible Children 2012). As
people started seeing their friends and family post the video on social media
there is a social pressure to join in the cause and share the video
yourself. Sharing the video can also be
seen as an act of impression management.
By posting the video on social media people create a public image of
themselves that they are informed about worldly issues and trying to make a
difference. Celebrities like Justin
Bieber and Oprah also played a role in spreading Kony 2012 (Goodman 2012). Celebrities joining in on the cause added to
the social pressure to share the video.
While social media initially spread the Kony 2012 video,
it also propagated the many criticisms against it. Social pressures shifted from supporting Kony
2012 to understanding that the video was problematic. In my personal experience, five years later
the Kony 2012 video is often the butt of jokes and seen as a corny internet
trend backed by a for profit charity.
While it may have ultimately failed, the Kony 2012 phenomenon show us
how people can be brought together and empowered by social media. It also serves as an example of how
misinformation, and criticisms of such misinformation, can spread online.
Works Cited
Domonoske, Camila. "U.S., Uganda Call Off Search For Infamous
Warlord Joseph Kony." NPR. NPR, 21 Apr. 2017. Web. 22 Apr. 2017.
"Fact Checking The 'Kony 2012' Viral Video." NPR.
NPR, 08 Mar. 2012. Web. 22 Apr. 2017.
J. David Goodman and Jennifer Preston. "How the Kony Video
Went Viral." The New York Times. The New York Times, 09 Mar. 2012.
Web. 22 Apr. 2017.
Keating, Joshua. "Guest Post: Joseph Kony Is Not in Uganda
(and Other Complicated Things)." Foreign Policy. N.p., 07 Mar.
2012. Web. 22 Apr. 2017.
"KONY 2012." Invisible Children. N.p., n.d. Web.
22 Apr. 2017.
Rozen, Laura. "Kony
2012: Invisible Children's Viral Video Sparks Criticism That Others Say Is
Unfounded." Yahoo! News. Yahoo!, 08 Mar. 2012. Web.
I was intrigued by this article because I remember seeing the Kony 2012 video and even sharing it when it was first going around. Thinking about it now, I realize that I don't remember seeing any proactive strategies in the video, just a sensationalized way to raise awareness.
ReplyDeleteThis post is intriguing. I remember how big of a deal Kony 2012 was, and it’s cool to take this situation and look at it through a sociological lens. I really liked your section about how after the video was released, sharing the video was a form of impression management. To piggyback on that, I specifically remember Kony awareness merchandise being a highly praised fad at school. Also, all the “popular” kids at school made posts about how they ordered their Kony merchandise. Your post made me realize that them posting about buying the Kony awareness wristbands and wearing them at school is an exact form of impression management. The video gave kids another opportunity to “perform for others” by trying to show their peers they were people who cared about current world problems, and cared about this particular issue enough to spend their money on it.
ReplyDelete