On December 7, 2016 Danica Roem became the first ever transgender person elected to state legislature. A few weeks later the Virginia GOP announced that they wanted to begin using non gendered titles when addressing delegates. While House Leader Kirk Cox, a republican, said that this move was being thought about for a long time and that it was time for this to occur. Interpreted by many to be an attempt to invalidates Roem's womanhood and to specifically allow them to not call her a woman. However, the GOP failed to realize that a non gendered title is beneficial to non binary people, since it removes the awkwardness of having to correct people or having to challenge people who purposely misgender.
Why were these law makers so uneducated about a subject that they want to fight against? This question comes up again and again when discussing transgender rights. Although this topic may seem fairly new and foreign to some transgender people have been around for as long as people themselves. For most of recorded European history individuals who did not adhere to the gender binary were ridiculed or shunned from society. As time went on these people kept on being pushed down by European society until it seemed as though they no longer existed.
So this prompts the question of why are we seeing transgender people now in everyday society. Why is Danica Roem winning elections, why is The Switch, a sit com about transgender people living in Vancouver, becoming popular? One option is just time. The collective rebellion over thousands of years finally coming out and triumphing. Another is changing perspective on gender with cisgender people. Judith Lorber writes in “Night to his Day”:The Social Construction of Gender, "gender, like culture, is a human
production that depends on everyone constantly 'doing gender'". This ideology has become more pervasive with time resulting in the world we have now. In my opinion the most logical option is the slow disassembly of imperialist Western culture. When Europe, and later on America, began colonizing the world the invaders destroyed and ripped apart the native cultures. In what would become California, Spanish missionaries killed any Native Americans who did not do the work that was associated with their sex. This created a world in which the only ideology was the Western one. As time went on ideology, and more importantly what was societally acceptable, changed. It was no longer allowed, in the classic sense, to kill anyone who did not follow the same mindset as you. Now rights for marginalized groups could explode outward and create a society in which these people were not murdered everyday. This made certain parts of what was considered normal to collapse, but only in certain locations were laws actually changed and these people congregated. When transgender people grouped together they forced people to learn and acknowledge them. However, in places like Virginia, where Danica Roem is from, the past societal constructs were still in place due to a lack of knowledge on these people. This resulted in a dichotomy in which transgender individuals were hidden in the eyes of the media and the everyday, but were living their lives in cities. As time progressed trans people gradually became more public as they became involved in ads, writing, and just life. Thus we have the society were we live now were Roem can go to the American Music Awards with Demi Lovato, and yet still be attacked and pushed down by her political adversaries.
I was immediately drawn to your article because I think that the increase in transgender visibility that has been occurring over the past few years is important to analyze. When I read that the Virginia GOP wanted to begin using non-gendered titles after Roam's election, I was shocked. I'm glad that your article touched on the contradictions of their want of using gender neutral terms because as a group, they have famously enforced the use of the gender binary throughout history. When you give the explanation of why attitudes towards transgender people has shifted in recent history with the reasoning that time is the only thing that can help, I feel like it is a little bit short-sighted. I agree that time as a factor does help with the acceptance of marginalized groups, but I feel like listing only time as a fact erases the hard work of the trans rights movement. When connecting this struggle of transgender individuals with the discrimination against African Americans (specifically that of Clyde Ross and the Contract Buyers League), it can more clearly be seen how societal change must come from a driving force. Yes, time has helped racial segregation since that period, but the formation of a group was necessary in order to educate the public of the societal issues that must be challenged. Overall, I really enjoyed your article and think that we are at a pivotal time in history where this level of analysis is needed.
ReplyDeleteI was also intrigued by your article and the title-as trans visibility in itself is an oxymoron within our society today. I like what you're bringing up as this needs to be discussed. It seems like we only focus on trans visibility when we are trying to propose some other sort of rhetoric, much like the Virginia GOP. It also makes me think about how the people we elect that are supposedly "representing" us know little to nothing about a majority of their constituents. Rhetoric of the LBGTQ+ community is rarely discussed, and when it is, it's usually to promote another policy or speak about it on negative terms. I agree that while these movements take time, we also cannot just sit here and wait for more trans people or minorities to be elected into office-it's just not going to happen. There needs to be a much stronger rhetoric for this community within our daily lives as well as between our representatives and this is only going to happen if we keep discussing it, and if we produce more blogs like this to promote visibility !!!
Delete