Example of "gendered movement" onstage, Source: Wenner Media |
David Bowie is often remembered not only for his songwriting and various musical abilities, but for his frequently shifting alter egos and his androgynous, otherworldly stage performances. Using characters such as “Ziggy Stardust” and “The Thin White Duke”, he was able to completely subvert and blur the lines that make up the performative acts of gender and self.
As
discussed by Judith Butler in Performative
Acts and Gender Constitution, gender is an inherently performative act put
on equally for one’s self and for those around them. In 2019, it’s not uncommon
for people to intentionally subvert and play with ideas of gender with the
intent of undermining traditional gender roles, but in the early 1970s when
Bowie started experimenting with these ideas onstage it was groundbreaking. Androgyny in the world of
rock had been pioneered by his contemporaries such as Marc Bolan of the band T.
Rex, but Bowie took this to a level that had previously not been explored by creating
a character he would perform as every single time he went onstage between 1971
and 1973. This character was named “Ziggy Stardust”, and in short it was a non-binary
space alien from Mars that traveled to Earth to spread messages of love and
rock and roll.
It
wasn’t that Bowie was completely disregarding the idea of “doing gender”, it was
that he was taking it to such an extreme level as to completely change what it meant
to do so. When performing as Ziggy Stardust, Bowie would dress in elaborate,
flashy costumes that didn’t quite fit into traditionally “male” or “female”
categories of clothing. These varied quite a bit, from strange kimono/short
skirt mixtures, to elaborately colored jumpsuits, to garments that don’t even
have names in the English language to describe them. Another integral part of his
visual breakdown of gender consisted of the makeup he would wear. When
performing, he would paint his face in white, pink, and gold in order to give
himself an otherworldly appearance, but it also played a part in contributing
to his breakdown of gender. By applying it in a way that wasn’t traditionally
male or female, but something else entirely, it subverts expectations in a way
that “does gender” without signaling male or female.
Source: The Japan Times |
Source: Mick Rock |
His
onstage appearance played a very significant role in this breakdown of “doing
gender” but what played an equally important role was the performances
themselves. When watching videos of Bowie performing as Ziggy Stardust,
something is immediately apparent about the way he moves onstage. It’s common
knowledge that there are subtle differences in the way that men and women move
and walk, but Bowie takes this "gendered movement" to an entirely new level. A majority of the time,
there’s something unnameable yet undoubtedly feminine about the way he moves,
but this becomes especially apparent when he switches between moving in
traditionally masculine and feminine ways. It’s difficult to describe in words,
but it’s immediately apparent when viewing it.
In
addition to subverting and muddling traditional ideas of doing gender, the
alter-ego of Ziggy Stardust was also used by Bowie to subvert the idea of doing
self. As Bowie’s popularity grew in the early 70s, the Ziggy character started
to become more than an onstage persona. It started to become the way that
he lived. Wherever he went he would dress extravagantly like Ziggy did, he
would wear more subdued versions of the stage makeup, he would interview not
just as British rock star David Bowie, but as a mixture of Bowie and the new character
he invented. His alter-ego simply became another aspect of his personality that
he could switch back and forth between, almost eliminating the standard view of
“doing self” and replacing it with distorted, more extreme version of it. He
wasn’t just “doing self” to show the world the version of David Bowie that he
wanted them to see, he was doing self to manufacture an entirely new person
that he could turn into. This culminated on July 3, 1973 when Bowie killed
Ziggy onstage by announcing that the character that brought him to fame was no
more. Bowie unlocked a new aspect of his psyche by taking “doing self” to an
extreme, before committing a sort of public ego-murder, eliminating part of
himself in ritual fashion.
Bowie as Ziggy while not performing, Source:Mick Rock |
Ziggy
Stardust was originally intended as just a vehicle to get to the type of
immersive onstage experience that Bowie envisioned, but it quickly became
more than that. Ziggy became a way to break down the gender binary 40 years
before it was a mainstream idea and to change the concept of self into something
else entirely. By using this character, Bowie was able to take ideas of self
and gender to the extreme, and in the process, completely subvert them.
Bibliography
Butler, Judith. “Performative Acts and Gender
Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory.” Theatre
Journal, vol. 40, no. 4, Dec. 1988, p. 519., doi:10.2307/3207893.
Hill, Marian. “David Bowie and His Alter Egos.” The
Connector, The Connector, 6 Oct. 2018,
scadconnector.com/2018/10/07/david-bowie-and-his-alter-egos/.
Thian, Helene M. “For David Bowie, Japanese Style Was
More than Just Fashion.” The Japan Times, The Japan Times Ltd., 11 June
2013,
www.japantimes.co.jp/life/2013/06/11/style/for-david-bowie-japanese-style-was-more-than-just-fashion/#.XMYdguhKhPY.
I loved how you discussed Ziggy Stardust as as a way of subverting gender! In addition to looking at David Bowie through his subversion of “doing gender”, it would also be interesting to look at Bowie’s connection to deviance and subcultures. He pretty much made subcultures through his deviance from cultural norms. He was one of the first to start normalizing subversion of gender norms (like clothing, make-up use, how he walked and talked), of sexuality, and of using his music as a tool to do those things.
ReplyDeleteZiggy Stardust most reminded me of the Oscar Wilde quote: "Man is least in least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth." I find this quote relevant to Ziggy because of the questions revolving around Bowie's own sexuality and, sometimes, his gender identity. By taking on this persona, he added to the mystery, which I believe was the point of Ziggy's character. Bowie wanted to deconstruct gender and by creating a character that is its own gender, he constructed a new path for people to follow for their own gender identity. What I also wonder is whether Bowie identified more with Ziggy and his messages than his own. Would Bowie have had the same influence if he hadn't used Ziggy Stardust?
ReplyDelete