(Women’s Sports Foundation)
It was my first year, the
week of preseason for women’s soccer and it was my job to change the laundry
loops at our athletic facilities, however, being new to campus I was scared to
walk across campus alone at night. I had asked one of my football playing
neighbors to walk with me. On the way, he was bragging all about their locker
room and how it was “hella cool”, they had comfy couches and were able to play Xbox.
It was hard to believe him because the women’s soccer locker room was dark,
cramped, we had one loveseat, lockers similar to the one’s I had in middle
school with no space for our equipment. We all had to stagger ourselves when we
changed so as to not elbow our teammate’s in the face. He was able to show me their
locker room and it was extremely spacious. I understand they are a considerably
larger team than soccer in number and in size, but their locker room was
beautiful compared to ours. They have full person lockers made of wood that you
see professional teams have, they have enough room to sit down and multiple
cabinets to hold their gear. Throughout the rest of the locker room they have
comfortable, leather couches and TV’s set up across from them. And, don’t want
to forget the two Xboxes they had set up. That was my reality check where I
realized that my gender would determine the quality and opportunities given to
me of my athletic experience in college (Thomas, 2019).
There is much awareness
of the inequality that is present in collegiate sports. Many studies have been
conducted that have stated Division I institutions are very unlikely to be in
compliance of Title IX, which is the law that was created to provide equal
opportunities for both genders in education which includes athletics (Stafford
2004, Anderson et al., 2003). These studies looked at the participation levels
which have increased greatly since the introduction of Title IX in 1972.
However, there has been
this huge increase of participation for women in sports they still do not
receive the same level of funding in Division III, a women’s team is expected
to receive 8.31% less spent on them than a men’s team (Thomas, 2019). The
social issue of gender inequality in sports is happening at all levels of athletics
and across the country.
Not only, is the
difference in funding creating a feeling of lesser value in female student-athletes
it is encouraging toxic masculinity. For example, football is a symbol of
masculinity because the sport promotes “big, strong, tough, aggressive, and
muscular men” (Meyer, 2014). These symbols of masculinity are supported by
receiving more attention through media coverage or through more funding. In
Division III, institutions with football programs the female teams have 9.64%
less spent on them and in institutions without football programs have 6.39%
less spent on them (Thomas, 2019). This perpetuates toxic masculinity on and
off the field and has been linked to domestic violence cases (Meyer, 2014).
Here is a statement that
can be found on the NCAA’s page on what Division III athletics has to offer:
“Division III athletics departments
place special importance on the impact of athletics on the participants rather
than on the spectators. The student-athlete’s experience is of paramount concern.”
But what kind of experience is this? Men are
being rewarded for characteristic that are proven to lead to more domestic
abuse and female student-athletes are left feeling less valued and voiceless. And the “paramount concern” of the quality of
our experience is not felt, not once in my experience in collegiate athletics was
I told about ways I can openly discuss Title IX with my coaches or
administration. I was shocked when Shana Levine, athletic director at Lewis and
Clark college thinks student-athletes and parents need to take more action to
call attention to the inequalities (2019). How are female student-athletes
shown they have the power to make any of these changes? I only heard about
instances when these concerns are brought up and they normally received a shrug
of the shoulders, or when I asked my coaches why the athletic trainers are
always closed after our practices (which end at 7pm) but they stay open till
10pm when it is football season. The people in power to make any changes for
gender inequality are the administration but they continue to perpetuate the
situation by ignoring concerns that are brought up and making decisions continuing
to fund and provide more benefits to men’s sports more than their women teams. This
leaves the female student-athletes with the belief that their experience in
collegiate sports is less valued and then this belief of less importance
continues after their college experience.
Sources:
Anderson, Deborah J., Cheslock, John J., and Ehrenberg,
Ronald G. “Gender Equity in Intercollegiate Athletics: Determinants of Title IX
Compliance.” University of Arizona, 2003.
Levine, Shana. Personal Interview. 14 Mar 2019.
Meyer, Elizabet J. “NFL’s Masculinity Problem and How it
Affects Us All.” Psychology Today. 2014.
Nowakowski, Audrey. “From Financial Inequality to Sexism,
Women in Sports Still Face an Uphill Battle”. 2016.
National Collegiate Athletic Administration. “What Does
Division III Have to Offer?” 2019.
National Federation of State High School Associations. “A
dramatic, 40-year rise.” 2012.
Stafford, S. “Assessing the effect of formal and informal
enforcement on progress towards Title IX compliance.” Social Science Quarterly,
vol 85, pp 1469-1486. 2004.
Thomas, Carla. “Is NCAA in compliance with Title IX?” 2019.
This post is super interesting because it highlights the way that gender inequality does not just exist in college sports when a significant amount of money is involved. I actually did my inequality essay about that and discovered that a common justification for unequal funding is that in Divison I schools football and mens basketball generate most of the funding. However, there is still funding and opportunity inequality at a place like Lewis and Clark, a Divison III school that does not generate a significant amount of money from sports. I think that reveals the ways in which Title IX has not been perfectly executed. I also think a key factor in the lack of awareness about Title IX is because there are very few Athletic directors that are women in big Division I schools. In fact, Shana Levine is an exception for most of the NCAA. It is hard to manufacture change if you as a leader do not have a vested interest in improving the funding gap.
ReplyDelete